CampaignFoundations.com

This morning another letter arrived accusing Ralph Nader and the Green Party of putting George Bush in office. In '01 and '02 they were coming in every week. We still get them now and then.

It's a lie. The arithmetical arguments commonly made to support it are not valid because they begin with false assumptions. "If pigs could fly, I would be king." The sentence is true, but it doesn't tell you anything. "If Nader had not run, Gore would be president." Likewise. Nader ran. The universe where Nader did not run does not exist. It's a fantasy.

I believe the greatest single strategic mistake in the history of Green parties in the US was embracing that lie instead of forcefully rejecting and denying it. That decision allowed the Democratic Party to define the Green Party in the journalistic and public mind. Since then, almost every mainstream media story mentioning the Greens hangs on the "hook" that Nader put Bush in office It was a shortcut: look how powerful we are, to determine the outcome of a presidential election! Of course we didn't have anywhere near that kind of power. Embracing "the spoiler effect" was a disaster for us.

read more

Re: Bayoneting a Scarecrow

(George Monbiot reviewed Loose Change in The Guardian. "Bayoneting" is about reaction to the review.)

read more

Yesterday several Santa Clara County Greens visited our three congressional representatives' offices. Just to make things more interesting we did the circuit on the VTA Light Rail trolley and Caltrain heavy rail, and Drew had his bicycle.

We presented our resolution demanding that they stop supporting the Iraq war. The congresscritters don't give a damn what we think, but it's important to keep bothering them. We also stopped at the mostly abandoned San Jose Mercury News office in Palo Alto. Carol Broullet ran for Congress against warmonger Anna Eshoo last year, and holds a weekly "rally" down the street from there. Lofgren's staff was friendly. Honda's and Eshoo's staff were rude, making no secret of the fact that they really don't want their constituents showing up at their district offices.

read more

Shortly, an expensive publicity blitz will try to convince PC owners to "upgrade" to a new operating system (OS), MS-Windows Vista. It's a bigger threat to our rights and to progressive organizing than losing "net-neutrality." Don't do it.

You'll be told it's more "secure" than previous operating systems. Perhaps; each Microsoft (stock ticker symbol MSFT) OS gets a little better about that. But the real security "enhancements" in Vista are about securing the property rights of transnational media corporations. Vista tries really hard to stop you from copying proprietary "content": computer programs, movies and music. It's full of "kill switches," triggers that disable application programs and even hardware devices when the system detects an attempt to breach copyright. If you try to use MSFT Word, and your system can't verify through the Internet that your copy of MS-Word is paid for, you can't edit or create new files any more.

read more

Recently a correspondent mentioned in passing, "you'd better not say anything bad about Bill Gates." Her daughter had received tuition assistance from a Gates Foundation "charity." So I didn't tell her that schools which participate in that program aren't allowed to use Macintoshes in their classrooms.

The late 19th Century robber barons invented the modern public relations industry. Carnegie, Rockefeller, Mellon. Rockefeller had himself photographed giving dimes to poor children, and had full time employees to make sure those pictures made the newspapers and newsreels. You can bet he paid those "communications professionals" thousands of times more than he gave those children. But they weren't as effective as today's flacks, or the term "robber baron" never would have made it to public awareness.

read more

Friday from 5:30 6:30, Mountain View (CA) Voices for Peace has a "vigil" at the intersection of El Camino and Castro. Last weekend I showed up with my electric peace sign, visible blocks away. Tian posted his picture of it from the Dec 6 protest in downtown San Jose. I always forget to bring my camera to these things.

Afterwards, we strolled down Castro Street for dinner at Queen House mom & pop chinese. Merriam had her big IMPEACH BUSH posterboard because her car was out of the way. So here we were walking through the restaurant district on a chilly Friday evening with a big IMPEACH BUSH sign.

read more

You already know I'm on a quixotic mission to get people, especially progressive activists to actually try the great noncommercial software that we should be using instead of the corporate stuff.

Today's riff is a little piece on how to scrub a hard drive before you get rid of it, without spending money (or risking your security) on trade secret computer software. It's in the CNet help forum, which I suspect gets more traffic than progressive political weblogs.

We scrub the drive with a utility program that comes with all Linux distributions. So we begin by making a bootable CD with Damn Small Linux on it. For people who already know how to burn a CD, that's pretty easy. I put that part in a similar piece on my Windoze monopoly blog. Damn Small Linux can also be installed on a USB flash drive, but I don't go into that.

read more

I've been hosting and "owning" (nannying, moderating, facilitating...) Green email lists for a dozen years. Every few months someone asks/suggests/demands that I set the list(s) she is on to alter every message that goes through it. The alteration she wants is that the mailing list software should add a line to the message headers. That line should say "Reply-To: posting address".

The reason she wants the mailing list software to do that is that she is having trouble posting to the list. When she is looking at a message that came through the list, in her colorful and oh-so-user friendly email program, and she hits its big colorful "Reply" button, her email program opens a composing form. (Hey! The term for the computer program you use to read and send email is mail user agent or MUA. Microsoft Outlook Express is an MUA. So is the part of Yahoo Mail that you interact with.) The composing form has a To: line with the author of the message filled in. She wanted to post a followup to the list, not to the previous poster in private. She is having trouble changing that To: line so her message will go to the list.

read more

Recently I've been getting porn spam from a big Canadian outfit called Webfinity a/k/a Python Video a/k/a Dynamic Pipe.

It uses an extra layer of indirection, exploiting a parade of compromised Microsoft Windows machines in consumers' homes. If you click on a link in the spam, the site you eventually reach attacks your PC with malicious software, and your Microsoft PC becomes part of Python's porn server network. Ironic, eh?

The extra layer requires some kind of stable support base. That base is the domain name registration function at Yahoo Small Business hosting. Details here. Python has to register dozens of new nonsense domain names daily, at ten bucks a pop. Think Yahoo doesn't know? You already knew Yahoo Inc was part of the Nigerian advance free fraud gang's support network. Now you know they help bring you beastiality porn spam, and malicious software, too.

read more

Has anybody but me noticed a change in the common use of the word "attack"?  Since 9/11, the slightest public disagreement or criticism is an "attack."  The propaganda state wants us continually aware of "attacks" of all kinds from all directions.

We are living in the world George Orwell warned us about.  The language we might use to understand and discuss the regime that oppresses us is being taken away, one term at a time, by misuse in propaganda.  Consider the valuable words whose once fairly specific meanings have been practically destroyed.  Recycle.  Feminist.  Fascist.  Liberal.  Geek.  Marketing.  Censorship.  Organic.  You can think of a dozen more.

It's not the normal evolution of language.  In that evolution, words get more versatile, more useful, more natural.  Hopefully, a new part of speech ("sentence modifier") appeared in American English in the last century.  Thinkfully, you can spot it at the beginning of this sentence.  Dictionaries haven't caught up: they're still trying to bend "adverb" to fit.  The convolutions we used in elementary school to avoid ending a sentence with a preposition are a thing up with which we need no longer put.  You can even say "very unique" without showing yourself an ignoramus.  (Don't do it in a business letter or a resume, though.)  All of those changes represent constructive evolution.  Taking meaning away is destructive.

This is double plus ungood, folks.  We should resist.  A critique is not an "attack."  Disagreement is not an "attack."